We raised $3M for agent-native runners

Write every failure to a file and let fixer agents work through it by area

Failing tests and compiler errors are saved to a file, grouped by package, and each group goes to an implementer, reviewers and a fixer.

How Anthropic used this technique

Read what Anthropic changed and follow the original sources.

Write every failure to a file and let fixer agents work through it by area

Translated to GitHub Actions

What Anthropic built
Bun's Rust port wrote about 16,000 compiler errors to a file, grouped by crate, and a workflow divided them among 64 Claudes.
Your GitHub Actions version
A workflow step that writes every failure to a file, grouped by area, for fixer agents to work through.

Once Bun's Rust port was written, cargo check wrote about 16,000 compiler errors to a file, grouped by crate, and a workflow divided them among 64 Claudes: 16 loops across 4 worktrees, each with one Claude fixing, two reviewing and one applying. A second workflow looped on test files: each failing test saved its stack trace and errors to a file, one implementer proposed a fix, two adversarial reviewers checked it and a fixer applied it. The test runner gained a --results-json option that writes per-file results as JSON for those test-fix workflows.

Two days after the first CI run, the failing list was down from 972 test files to 23. Source

Use it when
A change leaves hundreds of failing tests or errors, or an agent fixes failures from a log too large to read at once.
Before applying it
Run the failing check once at the start of each group and commit at the end, so parallel agents do not start overlapping builds, and have a person read the loop's output and edit its instructions when it drifts.
GitHub Actions adaptation
Compare the source system with your own workflow before applying this translation.

Company Playbooks