- Comparisons
- StarSling vs Depot for GitHub Actions
StarSling vs Depot for GitHub Actions
StarSling is AI-native CI for GitHub Actions: drop-in Ubuntu runners plus agents that open optimization PRs for your workflows.
StarSling goes beyond Depot with Adaptive Compute: Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost. Its agents deliver reviewable optimization PRs that improve your workflows, and its skills optimize CI speed, configuration, and security. Review Runners run code review agents you configure, while GPU Runners power GPU tests and model evaluations.
Faster
StarSling Runners run your GitHub Actions jobs up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners.
Last updated 2026-10-29
sling why diagnoses why a job failed, with evidence and next steps, and sling time decomposes CI wall-clock into runner-lifecycle phases, and the skill teaches your agent to use it. Install the sling CLI.depot ci lists, diagnoses and reads the logs of Depot CI runs, with JSON output. Depot CI is a natural fit for AI coding agents.ubuntu-latest for starsling-ubuntu-26.04.runs-on label.Adaptive Compute
Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost. Up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners.
Savings
- Day one
- From moving the same unchanged suite onto our runners.
- Over time
- After the optimization agents have worked on the suite.
Agent-native means three things: skills your coding agent runs, a CLI it reads CI through, and agents that open the PRs.
Agent-generated PRs that optimize your CI
Pull Requests merged by customers. StarSling agents analyze and optimize your CI automatically.
Agent-first CLI for your CI
sling is the agent-first CLI for StarSling Runners: why a job failed, where the time went and what CI costs, and the skill teaches your agent to use it.
Agent skills that optimize your CI
Open source, one install, and they run on your machine: each skill reads your workflows and hands your coding agent the evidence to fix them.
Why choose StarSling over Depot?
Choose StarSling when you want to improve the whole GitHub Actions pipeline, from compute and workflow optimization to code review and GPU testing.
- Give each job faster compute: Adaptive Compute combines Sandbox Router's placement on the fastest available sandbox with Afterburner's extra CPU and RAM during a running step, at no extra cost.
- Improve the work your pipeline performs: StarSling agents deliver reviewable optimization PRs for workflow improvements. Inspect the changes in real repositories and merge the ones that fit your team.
- Turn CI findings into fixes: ci-speedup, ci-score, and ci-secure give your coding agent workflow-specific findings and fixes for speed, configuration, and security, applying CI optimization best practices.
- Own your code review: Review Runners run your chosen model, repo-native skills, scripts, and team-defined reviewers. Version review logic alongside your code.
- Give GPU tests their own hardware: GPU Runners provide dedicated NVIDIA GPUs for GPU tests, CUDA builds, and model evaluations, keeping CI off your production GPUs.
- Diagnose failures and wasted time: the sling CLI explains failed jobs with evidence and next steps and breaks wall-clock time into runner-lifecycle phases.
Explore GitHub Actions guides
How Depot speeds up Docker builds in CI
Docker builds are often slow in CI because an ephemeral runner starts without the layers your last build produced. Depot changes that part of the system by running builds on remote BuildKit builders in the same private network as the runner, with a persistent NVMe layer cache on the builder. Depot Cache is a separate remote cache product for GitHub Actions, Bazel, Go, Gradle, Turborepo, and other build tools.
StarSling does not move your Docker build to a separate builder service. The build stays inside your GitHub Actions workflow on faster StarSling runners, and standard BuildKit cache backends still work. The agent layer is the difference: it can open PRs that fix Dockerfile ordering, cache scopes, install steps, and workflow structure instead of only making the existing build machine faster.
Real StarSling results beyond a Docker cache
Depot is strongest when the Docker build itself is the bottleneck. StarSling's customer proof is broader: the agents have shipped PRs against caches, dependency installs, service readiness, test sharding, queue pressure, and runner right-sizing. These are published case-study windows, not head-to-head Depot benchmarks; follow each case study for source method and caveats.
- Better Auth: after migration and three agent PRs, E2E went from 2m 22s to 1m 04s and CI went from 1m 40s to 1m 02s.
- Mastra: agents replaced fixed sleeps, added healthchecks, sharded E2E, and migrated workflows; Combined store Tests measured 29m 56s to 5m 06s in the post-migration window.
- Partcl: on a synthesis-bound workload, the agents cut heaviest-job compute cost 13x per run and reduced p95 queue time from 9.5 minutes to 35 seconds.
Choose StarSling if
Teams that want Adaptive Compute for faster jobs, agent PRs and skills that improve CI, configurable code review agents, and dedicated GPUs for tests and model evaluations.
Choose Depot if
Teams whose primary bottleneck is Docker image build time and who want best-in-class remote build caching.
FAQ
Why choose StarSling over Depot?
Choose StarSling when you want to improve the whole GitHub Actions pipeline, from compute and workflow optimization to code review and GPU testing. Adaptive Compute improves job placement and supplies extra CPU and RAM during running steps. Agents deliver workflow optimization PRs, and CI skills identify and help fix speed, configuration, and security issues. Review Runners let you define your reviewers, while GPU Runners provide dedicated hardware for GPU tests and model evaluations.
Can I run my existing GitHub Actions workflows on StarSling?
Yes. StarSling Runners are a drop-in replacement: change the runs-on label to starsling-ubuntu-26.04 and keep your existing workflows.
Other comparisons
Compare StarSling with the other runner and CI options teams evaluate.
- StarSling vs GitHub Actions
- StarSling vs Blacksmith runners for GitHub Actions
- StarSling vs WarpBuild
- Buildkite vs GitHub Actions: where StarSling fits
- GitHub Actions vs Jenkins: where StarSling fits
- GitHub Actions vs GitLab CI/CD: comparison and migration
- CircleCI vs GitHub Actions: migration and StarSling runners
- StarSling vs Namespace runners for GitHub Actions
- StarSling vs RunsOn runners for GitHub Actions
- StarSling vs Ubicloud runners for GitHub Actions
- Compare GitHub Actions runners and CI platforms: StarSling vs GitHub-hosted, Depot, Blacksmith, WarpBuild, Buildkite, and Namespace
References
- StarSling Runners are now generally available (opens in new tab)
- Launch YC: StarSling Runners - Self-Driving CI (opens in new tab)
- StarSling docs (opens in new tab)
- ci-speedup skill source (open source, MIT) (opens in new tab)
- ci-score skill source (open source, MIT) (opens in new tab)
- ci-secure skill source (open source, MIT) (opens in new tab)
- What is AI-native CI?
- All StarSling comparisons
- GitHub Actions alternatives
- GitHub Actions pricing
- Self-hosted GitHub Actions runners
- Benchmark on your own workflows (opens in new tab)
- Migration guide (opens in new tab)
- Runner label reference (opens in new tab)
- Runner instance types (opens in new tab)
- Adaptive Compute: up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners
- Levels of CI: every way to make GitHub Actions cheaper and faster
- Install the /ci-speedup skill to fix slow GitHub Actions
- Install the /ci-score skill to improve your GitHub Actions setup
- Install the /ci-secure skill to close critical attack vectors in GitHub Actions
Try the AI-native runner.
One line to install. Faster runs on day one, and agents that keep optimizing your pipeline through reviewable PRs.
