We raised $3M for agent-native runners

StarSling vs RunsOn runners for GitHub Actions

StarSling is AI-native CI for GitHub Actions: drop-in Ubuntu runners plus agents that open optimization PRs for your workflows.

StarSling goes beyond RunsOn with Adaptive Compute: Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost. Its agents deliver reviewable optimization PRs that improve your workflows, and its skills optimize CI speed, configuration, and security. Review Runners run code review agents you configure, while GPU Runners power GPU tests and model evaluations.

Faster

StarSling Runners run your GitHub Actions jobs up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners.

How StarSling works

Last updated 2026-10-29

Head to head

Benchmark build time (x64, 8 to 12 vCPU, p90 wait + job)
StarSlingRust 1m 54s, TypeScript 1m 07s (Sep 30 to Oct 4, 2026)
RunsOnRust 2m 02s, TypeScript 1m 14s (Sep 30 to Oct 4, 2026)
Adaptive Compute
StarSlingYes. Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost.
RunsOnNo. A runs-on label sets CPU and memory ranges, and the instance is picked from them when the job launches.
Agent-generated PRs that optimize your CI
StarSlingYes. AI agents analyze logs/telemetry and open optimization PRs. See example PRs. CI harness with an agent loop.
RunsOnNo. RunsOn offers rightsizing guidance for choosing instance labels, and no agent that opens optimization PRs.
Agent-first CLI for your CI
StarSlingYes. sling why diagnoses why a job failed, with evidence and next steps, and sling time decomposes CI wall-clock into runner-lifecycle phases, and the skill teaches your agent to use it. Install the sling CLI.
RunsOnThe roc CLI troubleshoots a RunsOn installation: it fetches RunsOn server and instance logs for a job URL and opens a shell on the runner.
Agent skills that optimize your CI
StarSlingYes. ci-speedup for wall clock, ci-score for configuration and ci-secure for security: each reads your workflows and hands your coding agent the evidence to fix them. Works with your existing runner provider.
RunsOnNo agent skills. RunsOn runs AI-assisted CI, such as Copilot coding agent, on its runners.
Speed vs GitHub-hosted runners
StarSlingYes. Up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners with Adaptive Compute. Adaptive Compute: up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners. StarSling tops the GitHub Actions runner benchmarks.
RunsOnYes:Faster than GitHub-hosted runners.
Operating systems
StarSlingUbuntu 26.04 or 24.04 Linux runners.
RunsOnLinux x64 and arm64, Windows, and GPU instances.
Caching
StarSlingKeep GitHub Actions cache steps for the initial trial. AI optimization PRs can improve cache keys, dependency installs and build steps.
RunsOnAn extras=s3-cache label option backs actions/cache with an S3 bucket in your account, and Docker layer caching is built in.
Unlimited concurrency
StarSlingYes. Concurrency is unlimited.
RunsOnRunsOn sets no concurrency cap of its own; the AWS quotas on your account set the limit.
Where runners run
StarSlingOn StarSling-managed runners. Install the StarSling GitHub App and change the runs-on label.
RunsOnOn ephemeral EC2 instances in your own AWS account, deployed from a CloudFormation template or Terraform module, with a GitHub App on your organization.
Selecting a runner
StarSlingYes, swap ubuntu-latest for starsling-ubuntu-26.04.
RunsOnA runs-on label that describes the instance, such as runs-on=${{ github.run_id }}/runner=2cpu-linux-x64, with constraints for CPU count, instance family and image.
Billing model
StarSlingUsage-based per-minute, from $0.004/min (2 vCPU) to $0.128/min (64 vCPU); queue time never billed; no seat fees.
RunsOnA flat annual license per legal entity. EC2 compute, the S3 cache bucket and EBS volumes are billed by AWS to your own account.
Capacity
StarSling5th Gen AMD EPYC; 2-64 vCPU; unlimited concurrency.
RunsOnSpot instances first with on-demand fallback, and warm pools for faster job starts.

Faster

Adaptive Compute

Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost. Up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners.

Savings

Day one
From moving the same unchanged suite onto our runners.
Over time
After the optimization agents have worked on the suite.
Pricing

Agent-native CI

Agent-native means three things: skills your coding agent runs, a CLI it reads CI through, and agents that open the PRs.

Why choose StarSling over RunsOn?

Choose StarSling for managed GitHub Actions compute and agents that improve the workflow, with runner operations handled for you.

  • Give each job faster compute: Adaptive Compute combines Sandbox Router's placement on the fastest available sandbox with Afterburner's extra CPU and RAM during a running step, at no extra cost.
  • Improve the work your pipeline performs: StarSling agents deliver reviewable optimization PRs for workflow improvements. Inspect the changes in real repositories and merge the ones that fit your team.
  • Turn CI findings into fixes: ci-speedup, ci-score, and ci-secure give your coding agent workflow-specific findings and fixes for speed, configuration, and security, applying CI optimization best practices.
  • Own your code review: Review Runners run your chosen model, repo-native skills, scripts, and team-defined reviewers. Version review logic alongside your code.
  • Give GPU tests their own hardware: GPU Runners provide dedicated NVIDIA GPUs for GPU tests, CUDA builds, and model evaluations, keeping CI off your production GPUs.
  • Diagnose failures and wasted time: the sling CLI explains failed jobs with evidence and next steps and breaks wall-clock time into runner-lifecycle phases.

Benchmarks: StarSling vs RunsOn

In RunsOn's public GitHub Actions runner benchmark of Rust and TypeScript builds on x64 runners at 8 to 12 vCPU (p90 wait + job time, September 30 to October 4, 2026), StarSling ranked first on both builds with Rust 1m 54s and TypeScript 1m 07s. RunsOn recorded Rust 2m 02s and TypeScript 1m 14s.

Each figure is a provider's best runner in that size range, on a cold Rust build and a cold TypeScript build. RunsOn runs the benchmark and sells one of the runners it measures. Its harness and raw results carry all nine providers, and our write-up walks through them.

How RunsOn runners work

RunsOn deploys into your AWS account from a CloudFormation template or its Terraform module, which brings up the VPC, cache bucket, IAM roles and scheduler together. A GitHub App on your organization registers an ephemeral runner when a job asks for one, and the instance ends with the job.

A job selects its machine through the runs-on label, which RunsOn treats as a query: constraints such as CPU count, instance family and image are resolved when the instance launches. RunsOn tries spot capacity first and falls back to on-demand.

RunsOn licensing and billing

RunsOn charges a flat annual license per legal entity, covering the GitHub organizations and AWS accounts you own or control. The EC2 instances, S3 cache bucket and EBS volumes are billed by AWS to your account, with compute billed per second. A free license covers nonprofit, open-source, educational and personal non-commercial projects.

StarSling bills per runner minute, from $0.004/min (2 vCPU) to $0.128/min (64 vCPU), with queue time never billed and no seat fees. Use the GitHub Actions pricing guide to model your own workload, and Self-hosted GitHub Actions runners for the cost of running runners in your own cloud.

Try StarSling on one Linux workflow

Choose a representative Ubuntu job with a clear success condition. Keep the same commit, tests and build outputs across the comparison, and record queue time separately from execution time.

  • Install the StarSling GitHub App for the trial repository, then choose a label from StarSling runner sizes. The default starsling-ubuntu-26.04 selects 4 vCPU; match the size to the RunsOn instance you are comparing.
  • Prepare a small workflow PR. Where the job uses RunsOn label options such as extras=s3-cache, restore GitHub Actions caching in the same PR. Preserve required check names, permissions and test commands.
  • Run repeated cold-cache and warm-cache trials. Compare completed work, error rate, queue time, execution time and the full cost: the runner minutes on one side, the license plus the AWS bill on the other.
  • Keep the original workflow revision available. Roll back the trial by reverting the runner label and any cache edits together.

Workflow optimization you can inspect

Read the public Mastra optimization PRs and results and Better Auth case study to see changes to real workflows, the measured windows and the work behind each result. Use those examples to identify a testable improvement in your own pipeline.

Optimization PRs are on paid plans, off by default for new accounts.

Best fit

Choose StarSling if

Teams that want Adaptive Compute for faster jobs, agent PRs and skills that improve CI, configurable code review agents, and dedicated GPUs for tests and model evaluations.

Choose RunsOn if

Teams that want runners inside their own AWS account, with compute on their AWS bill and a choice of EC2 instance per job, including Windows and GPU instances.

FAQ

Why choose StarSling over RunsOn?

Choose StarSling for managed GitHub Actions compute and agents that improve the workflow, with runner operations handled for you. Adaptive Compute improves job placement and supplies extra CPU and RAM during running steps. Agents deliver workflow optimization PRs, and CI skills identify and help fix speed, configuration, and security issues. Review Runners let you define your reviewers, while GPU Runners provide dedicated hardware for GPU tests and model evaluations.

What does runs-on do in a GitHub Actions workflow?

runs-on: is the workflow key that selects the runner a job runs on, by label. RunsOn reads it as a query for an EC2 instance, and a StarSling job uses it to select starsling-ubuntu-26.04.

Can I move from RunsOn to StarSling by changing runs-on?

Start with an Ubuntu job and a StarSling label. If the workflow uses RunsOn label options such as extras=s3-cache, restore GitHub Actions caching in the same trial PR. Test the resulting workflow and keep the original revision for rollback.

How should I compare RunsOn, Ubicloud and StarSling?

Start with where the compute should run, the operating systems you need and how each one bills, then run the same job on matched resources. This page covers RunsOn; StarSling vs Ubicloud runners for GitHub Actions covers Ubicloud. Measure runtime and total cost across repeated cold-cache and warm-cache runs before choosing.

Does installing StarSling enable AI optimization PRs?

Optimization PRs are on paid plans, off by default for new accounts.

Sources

Other comparisons

Compare StarSling with the other runner and CI options teams evaluate.

References

Get started

Try the AI-native runner.

One line to install. Faster runs on day one, and agents that keep optimizing your pipeline through reviewable PRs.