- Comparisons
- StarSling vs RunsOn runners for GitHub Actions
StarSling vs RunsOn runners for GitHub Actions
StarSling is AI-native CI for GitHub Actions: drop-in Ubuntu runners plus agents that open optimization PRs for your workflows.
StarSling goes beyond RunsOn with Adaptive Compute: Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost. Its agents deliver reviewable optimization PRs that improve your workflows, and its skills optimize CI speed, configuration, and security. Review Runners run code review agents you configure, while GPU Runners power GPU tests and model evaluations.
Faster
StarSling Runners run your GitHub Actions jobs up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners.
Last updated 2026-10-29
runs-on label sets CPU and memory ranges, and the instance is picked from them when the job launches.sling why diagnoses why a job failed, with evidence and next steps, and sling time decomposes CI wall-clock into runner-lifecycle phases, and the skill teaches your agent to use it. Install the sling CLI.roc CLI troubleshoots a RunsOn installation: it fetches RunsOn server and instance logs for a job URL and opens a shell on the runner.extras=s3-cache label option backs actions/cache with an S3 bucket in your account, and Docker layer caching is built in.runs-on label.ubuntu-latest for starsling-ubuntu-26.04.runs-on label that describes the instance, such as runs-on=${{ github.run_id }}/runner=2cpu-linux-x64, with constraints for CPU count, instance family and image.Adaptive Compute
Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost. Up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners.
Savings
- Day one
- From moving the same unchanged suite onto our runners.
- Over time
- After the optimization agents have worked on the suite.
Agent-native means three things: skills your coding agent runs, a CLI it reads CI through, and agents that open the PRs.
Agent-generated PRs that optimize your CI
Pull Requests merged by customers. StarSling agents analyze and optimize your CI automatically.
Agent-first CLI for your CI
sling is the agent-first CLI for StarSling Runners: why a job failed, where the time went and what CI costs, and the skill teaches your agent to use it.
Agent skills that optimize your CI
Open source, one install, and they run on your machine: each skill reads your workflows and hands your coding agent the evidence to fix them.
Why choose StarSling over RunsOn?
Choose StarSling for managed GitHub Actions compute and agents that improve the workflow, with runner operations handled for you.
- Give each job faster compute: Adaptive Compute combines Sandbox Router's placement on the fastest available sandbox with Afterburner's extra CPU and RAM during a running step, at no extra cost.
- Improve the work your pipeline performs: StarSling agents deliver reviewable optimization PRs for workflow improvements. Inspect the changes in real repositories and merge the ones that fit your team.
- Turn CI findings into fixes: ci-speedup, ci-score, and ci-secure give your coding agent workflow-specific findings and fixes for speed, configuration, and security, applying CI optimization best practices.
- Own your code review: Review Runners run your chosen model, repo-native skills, scripts, and team-defined reviewers. Version review logic alongside your code.
- Give GPU tests their own hardware: GPU Runners provide dedicated NVIDIA GPUs for GPU tests, CUDA builds, and model evaluations, keeping CI off your production GPUs.
- Diagnose failures and wasted time: the sling CLI explains failed jobs with evidence and next steps and breaks wall-clock time into runner-lifecycle phases.
Benchmarks: StarSling vs RunsOn
In RunsOn's public GitHub Actions runner benchmark of Rust and TypeScript builds on x64 runners at 8 to 12 vCPU (p90 wait + job time, September 30 to October 4, 2026), StarSling ranked first on both builds with Rust 1m 54s and TypeScript 1m 07s. RunsOn recorded Rust 2m 02s and TypeScript 1m 14s.
Each figure is a provider's best runner in that size range, on a cold Rust build and a cold TypeScript build. RunsOn runs the benchmark and sells one of the runners it measures. Its harness and raw results carry all nine providers, and our write-up walks through them.
How RunsOn runners work
RunsOn deploys into your AWS account from a CloudFormation template or its Terraform module, which brings up the VPC, cache bucket, IAM roles and scheduler together. A GitHub App on your organization registers an ephemeral runner when a job asks for one, and the instance ends with the job.
A job selects its machine through the runs-on label, which RunsOn treats as a query: constraints such as CPU count, instance family and image are resolved when the instance launches. RunsOn tries spot capacity first and falls back to on-demand.
RunsOn licensing and billing
RunsOn charges a flat annual license per legal entity, covering the GitHub organizations and AWS accounts you own or control. The EC2 instances, S3 cache bucket and EBS volumes are billed by AWS to your account, with compute billed per second. A free license covers nonprofit, open-source, educational and personal non-commercial projects.
StarSling bills per runner minute, from $0.004/min (2 vCPU) to $0.128/min (64 vCPU), with queue time never billed and no seat fees. Use the GitHub Actions pricing guide to model your own workload, and Self-hosted GitHub Actions runners for the cost of running runners in your own cloud.
Try StarSling on one Linux workflow
Choose a representative Ubuntu job with a clear success condition. Keep the same commit, tests and build outputs across the comparison, and record queue time separately from execution time.
- Install the StarSling GitHub App for the trial repository, then choose a label from StarSling runner sizes. The default
starsling-ubuntu-26.04selects 4 vCPU; match the size to the RunsOn instance you are comparing. - Prepare a small workflow PR. Where the job uses RunsOn label options such as
extras=s3-cache, restore GitHub Actions caching in the same PR. Preserve required check names, permissions and test commands. - Run repeated cold-cache and warm-cache trials. Compare completed work, error rate, queue time, execution time and the full cost: the runner minutes on one side, the license plus the AWS bill on the other.
- Keep the original workflow revision available. Roll back the trial by reverting the runner label and any cache edits together.
Workflow optimization you can inspect
Read the public Mastra optimization PRs and results and Better Auth case study to see changes to real workflows, the measured windows and the work behind each result. Use those examples to identify a testable improvement in your own pipeline.
Optimization PRs are on paid plans, off by default for new accounts.
Choose StarSling if
Teams that want Adaptive Compute for faster jobs, agent PRs and skills that improve CI, configurable code review agents, and dedicated GPUs for tests and model evaluations.
Choose RunsOn if
Teams that want runners inside their own AWS account, with compute on their AWS bill and a choice of EC2 instance per job, including Windows and GPU instances.
FAQ
Why choose StarSling over RunsOn?
Choose StarSling for managed GitHub Actions compute and agents that improve the workflow, with runner operations handled for you. Adaptive Compute improves job placement and supplies extra CPU and RAM during running steps. Agents deliver workflow optimization PRs, and CI skills identify and help fix speed, configuration, and security issues. Review Runners let you define your reviewers, while GPU Runners provide dedicated hardware for GPU tests and model evaluations.
What does runs-on do in a GitHub Actions workflow?
runs-on: is the workflow key that selects the runner a job runs on, by label. RunsOn reads it as a query for an EC2 instance, and a StarSling job uses it to select starsling-ubuntu-26.04.
Can I move from RunsOn to StarSling by changing runs-on?
Start with an Ubuntu job and a StarSling label. If the workflow uses RunsOn label options such as extras=s3-cache, restore GitHub Actions caching in the same trial PR. Test the resulting workflow and keep the original revision for rollback.
How should I compare RunsOn, Ubicloud and StarSling?
Start with where the compute should run, the operating systems you need and how each one bills, then run the same job on matched resources. This page covers RunsOn; StarSling vs Ubicloud runners for GitHub Actions covers Ubicloud. Measure runtime and total cost across repeated cold-cache and warm-cache runs before choosing.
Does installing StarSling enable AI optimization PRs?
Optimization PRs are on paid plans, off by default for new accounts.
Sources
- runs-on.comRead 2026-09-28
- runs-on.comRead 2026-10-14
Other comparisons
Compare StarSling with the other runner and CI options teams evaluate.
- StarSling vs GitHub Actions
- StarSling vs Depot for GitHub Actions
- StarSling vs Blacksmith runners for GitHub Actions
- StarSling vs WarpBuild
- Buildkite vs GitHub Actions: where StarSling fits
- GitHub Actions vs Jenkins: where StarSling fits
- GitHub Actions vs GitLab CI/CD: comparison and migration
- CircleCI vs GitHub Actions: migration and StarSling runners
- StarSling vs Namespace runners for GitHub Actions
- StarSling vs Ubicloud runners for GitHub Actions
- Compare GitHub Actions runners and CI platforms: StarSling vs GitHub-hosted, Depot, Blacksmith, WarpBuild, Buildkite, and Namespace
References
- StarSling Runners are now generally available (opens in new tab)
- Launch YC: StarSling Runners - Self-Driving CI (opens in new tab)
- StarSling docs (opens in new tab)
- ci-speedup skill source (open source, MIT) (opens in new tab)
- ci-score skill source (open source, MIT) (opens in new tab)
- ci-secure skill source (open source, MIT) (opens in new tab)
- What is AI-native CI?
- All StarSling comparisons
- GitHub Actions alternatives
- GitHub Actions pricing
- Self-hosted GitHub Actions runners
- Benchmark on your own workflows (opens in new tab)
- Migration guide (opens in new tab)
- Runner label reference (opens in new tab)
- Runner instance types (opens in new tab)
- Adaptive Compute: up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners
- Levels of CI: every way to make GitHub Actions cheaper and faster
- Install the /ci-speedup skill to fix slow GitHub Actions
- Install the /ci-score skill to improve your GitHub Actions setup
- Install the /ci-secure skill to close critical attack vectors in GitHub Actions
Try the AI-native runner.
One line to install. Faster runs on day one, and agents that keep optimizing your pipeline through reviewable PRs.
