We raised $3M for agent-native runners

StarSling vs Ubicloud runners for GitHub Actions

StarSling is AI-native CI for GitHub Actions: drop-in Ubuntu runners plus agents that open optimization PRs for your workflows.

StarSling goes beyond Ubicloud with Adaptive Compute: Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost. Its agents deliver reviewable optimization PRs that improve your workflows, and its skills optimize CI speed, configuration, and security. Review Runners run code review agents you configure, while GPU Runners power GPU tests and model evaluations.

Faster

StarSling Runners run your GitHub Actions jobs up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners.

How StarSling works

Last updated 2026-10-29

Head to head

Benchmark build time (x64, 8 to 12 vCPU, p90 wait + job)
StarSlingRust 1m 54s, TypeScript 1m 07s (Sep 30 to Oct 4, 2026)
UbicloudRust 2m 30s, TypeScript 1m 33s (Sep 30 to Oct 4, 2026)
Adaptive Compute
StarSlingYes. Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost.
UbicloudNo:Each Ubicloud label selects one VM size, and premium jobs fall back to standard runners when the premium fleet is busy.
Agent-generated PRs that optimize your CI
StarSlingYes. AI agents analyze logs/telemetry and open optimization PRs. See example PRs. CI harness with an agent loop.
UbicloudNo. Ubicloud has no agent that opens optimization PRs.
Agent-first CLI for your CI
StarSlingYes. sling why diagnoses why a job failed, with evidence and next steps, and sling time decomposes CI wall-clock into runner-lifecycle phases, and the skill teaches your agent to use it. Install the sling CLI.
UbicloudThe ubi CLI sends your commands to Ubicloud from the terminal.
Agent skills that optimize your CI
StarSlingYes. ci-speedup for wall clock, ci-score for configuration and ci-secure for security: each reads your workflows and hands your coding agent the evidence to fix them. Works with your existing runner provider.
UbicloudUbicloud offers runners, a cache and the ubi CLI, and no agent skills.
Speed vs GitHub-hosted runners
StarSlingYes. Up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners with Adaptive Compute. Adaptive Compute: up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners. StarSling tops the GitHub Actions runner benchmarks.
UbicloudYes:Faster than GitHub-hosted runners, on newer hardware.
Selecting a runner
StarSlingYes, swap ubuntu-latest for starsling-ubuntu-26.04.
UbicloudSwap ubuntu-latest for a label such as ubicloud-standard-2. The number is the vCPU count, -arm selects arm64, and -ubuntu-2204 selects Ubuntu 22.04.
Operating systems
StarSlingUbuntu 26.04 or 24.04 Linux runners.
Ubicloudx64 and arm64 Linux runners on Ubuntu 24.04 by default, with labels for Ubuntu 22.04 and 26.04.
Caching
StarSlingKeep GitHub Actions cache steps for the initial trial. AI optimization PRs can improve cache keys, dependency installs and build steps.
UbicloudA transparent cache behind actions/cache, actions/setup-* caches and Docker type=gha layer caching, with 30 GB per repository per week.
Unlimited concurrency
StarSlingYes. Concurrency is unlimited.
UbicloudNo published concurrency limit. US runners are enabled per account by emailing Ubicloud support with your expected peak vCPU concurrency.
Hardware
StarSling5th Gen AMD EPYC; 2-64 vCPU; unlimited concurrency.
UbicloudAMD EPYC 9454P for standard x64 runners, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D for premium runners, and Ampere Altra for arm64.
Billing model
StarSlingUsage-based per-minute, from $0.004/min (2 vCPU) to $0.128/min (64 vCPU); queue time never billed; no seat fees.
UbicloudUsage measured per minute and billed monthly.
Runner images
StarSlingThe label names the OS version, starsling-ubuntu-26.04, so every run gets Ubuntu 26.04. Ubuntu 26.04 and ubuntu-latest: which of your jobs break covers the move to Ubuntu 26.04.
UbicloudBuilt from the templates GitHub publishes in actions/runner-images, deployed a few days after GitHub's own release.

Faster

Adaptive Compute

Sandbox Router sends every job to the fastest available sandbox, and Afterburner adds up to 25% more CPU and up to 50% more RAM to a running step at no extra cost. Up to 2.32x faster than GitHub-hosted runners.

Savings

Day one
From moving the same unchanged suite onto our runners.
Over time
After the optimization agents have worked on the suite.
Pricing

Agent-native CI

Agent-native means three things: skills your coding agent runs, a CLI it reads CI through, and agents that open the PRs.

Why choose StarSling over Ubicloud?

Choose StarSling when you want faster Ubuntu jobs and reviewable improvements to caching, dependency installs, parallelization, and test execution.

  • Give each job faster compute: Adaptive Compute combines Sandbox Router's placement on the fastest available sandbox with Afterburner's extra CPU and RAM during a running step, at no extra cost.
  • Improve the work your pipeline performs: StarSling agents deliver reviewable optimization PRs for workflow improvements. Inspect the changes in real repositories and merge the ones that fit your team.
  • Turn CI findings into fixes: ci-speedup, ci-score, and ci-secure give your coding agent workflow-specific findings and fixes for speed, configuration, and security, applying CI optimization best practices.
  • Own your code review: Review Runners run your chosen model, repo-native skills, scripts, and team-defined reviewers. Version review logic alongside your code.
  • Give GPU tests their own hardware: GPU Runners provide dedicated NVIDIA GPUs for GPU tests, CUDA builds, and model evaluations, keeping CI off your production GPUs.
  • Diagnose failures and wasted time: the sling CLI explains failed jobs with evidence and next steps and breaks wall-clock time into runner-lifecycle phases.

Benchmarks: StarSling vs Ubicloud

In RunsOn's public GitHub Actions runner benchmark of Rust and TypeScript builds on x64 runners at 8 to 12 vCPU (p90 wait + job time, September 30 to October 4, 2026), StarSling ranked first on both builds with Rust 1m 54s and TypeScript 1m 07s. Ubicloud recorded Rust 2m 30s and TypeScript 1m 33s.

Each figure is a provider's best runner in that size range, on a cold Rust build and a cold TypeScript build. RunsOn runs the benchmark and sells one of the runners it measures. Its harness and raw results carry all nine providers, and our write-up walks through them.

How Ubicloud runners work

Ubicloud installs as the Ubicloud Managed Runners GitHub App. A job moves to Ubicloud when its runs-on label changes from ubuntu-latest to a Ubicloud label such as ubicloud-standard-2, and each job gets an isolated, clean and ephemeral VM.

Ubicloud's managed runner VMs run in Germany by default, with a US fleet Ubicloud enables per account.Ubicloud's source code is available under the AGPL license, so a team can also run the software itself.

Ubicloud cache and Docker layer caching

Ubicloud's transparent cache serves actions/cache, the package-manager caches in actions/setup-*, and Docker layer caching through type=gha, with 30 GB of cache storage per repository per week. Ubicloud recommends the transparent cache, and its older ubicloud/cache action is a drop-in replacement for actions/cache.

When moving a workflow between providers, list those cache actions next to the runner label, and restore GitHub Actions caching where the trial needs it.

Try StarSling on one Linux workflow

Choose a representative Ubuntu job with a clear success condition. Keep the same commit, tests and build outputs across the comparison, and record queue time separately from execution time.

  • Install the StarSling GitHub App for the trial repository, then choose a label from StarSling runner sizes. The default starsling-ubuntu-26.04 selects 4 vCPU; match the size to the Ubicloud label you are comparing.
  • Prepare a small workflow PR. Where the job uses ubicloud/cache, switch it back to actions/cache in the same PR. Preserve required check names, permissions and test commands.
  • Run repeated cold-cache and warm-cache trials. Compare completed work, error rate, queue time, execution time and billed usage. Use the GitHub Actions pricing guide to compare the cost of your actual workload.
  • Keep the original workflow revision available. Roll back the trial by reverting the runner label and any cache edits together.

Workflow optimization you can inspect

Read the public Mastra optimization PRs and results and Better Auth case study to see changes to real workflows, the measured windows and the work behind each result. Use those examples to identify a testable improvement in your own pipeline.

Optimization PRs are on paid plans, off by default for new accounts.

Best fit

Choose StarSling if

Teams that want Adaptive Compute for faster jobs, agent PRs and skills that improve CI, configurable code review agents, and dedicated GPUs for tests and model evaluations.

Choose Ubicloud if

Teams that want managed x64 and arm64 Linux runners with a transparent cache, or an open-source runner stack they can host themselves.

FAQ

Why choose StarSling over Ubicloud?

Choose StarSling when you want faster Ubuntu jobs and reviewable improvements to caching, dependency installs, parallelization, and test execution. Adaptive Compute improves job placement and supplies extra CPU and RAM during running steps. Agents deliver workflow optimization PRs, and CI skills identify and help fix speed, configuration, and security issues. Review Runners let you define your reviewers, while GPU Runners provide dedicated hardware for GPU tests and model evaluations.

Can I move from Ubicloud to StarSling by changing runs-on?

Start with an Ubuntu job and a StarSling label. If the workflow uses ubicloud/cache, switch it back to actions/cache in the same trial PR. Test the resulting workflow and keep the original revision for rollback.

How should I compare Ubicloud, RunsOn and StarSling?

Start with the architectures you need, where the compute should run and how each one bills, then run the same job on matched resources. This page covers Ubicloud; StarSling vs RunsOn runners for GitHub Actions covers RunsOn. Measure runtime and total cost across repeated cold-cache and warm-cache runs before choosing.

Does installing StarSling enable AI optimization PRs?

Optimization PRs are on paid plans, off by default for new accounts.

Sources

ubicloud.comRead 2026-10-14

Other comparisons

Compare StarSling with the other runner and CI options teams evaluate.

References

Get started

Try the AI-native runner.

One line to install. Faster runs on day one, and agents that keep optimizing your pipeline through reviewable PRs.